- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi Note 11S 5G vs Blade V40 Vita
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G vs ZTE Blade V40 Vita
What Redmi Note 11S 5G does better (16) and where Blade V40 Vita wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display5.1
6.2Camera3.9
6.0Battery7.4
6.5Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi Note 11S 5GBlade V40 Vita
| Redmi Note 11S 5G | Blade V40 Vita | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 168 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 214 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi Note 11S 5G better than Blade V40 Vita?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- 5GYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- NFCYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- Wired charging33 W vs 22 W+47%
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 260 ppi+53%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+50%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- Weight195 g vs 214 g+10%
Why is Blade V40 Vita better than Redmi Note 11S 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 509 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 360,255 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,820 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 51% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.6 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 13 | MyOS 11 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.16.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.76.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.46.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F13vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G6.26.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GvsTecno Pova 46.16.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GvsMotorola Moto G526.16.2

