How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F8 Pro vs Redmi K90 Pro Max

Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max

What Poco F8 Pro does better (2) and where Redmi K90 Pro Max wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F8 Pro
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $460
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2025Redmi K90 Pro Max
9.7Score
15 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
9.4Display9.7
9.0Performance9.7
9.1Camera9.7
9.4Battery9.7
9.7Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F8 ProRedmi K90 Pro Max
75.3 × 157.5877.8 × 163.37.9
Poco F8 ProRedmi K90 Pro MaxDifference
Height157.5 mm163.3 mm−5.8 mm
Width75.3 mm77.8 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness8 mm7.9 mm+0.1 mm
Weight199 g218 g−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F8 Pro better than Redmi K90 Pro Max?

  1. eSIMYes · Redmi K90 Pro Max: No
  2. Weight199 g vs 218 g+10%

Why is Redmi K90 Pro Max better than Poco F8 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,480,773 vs 3,897,821+57%
  2. Battery capacity6,210 mAh vs 7,560 mAh+22%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Optical zoom2.5× vs 5×2×
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Poco F8 Pro: Yes
  6. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,610 vs 11,219+30%
  8. 4K selfie videoNo · Poco F8 Pro: Yes
  9. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,068 vs 6,490+7%
  10. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+6%
  11. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
  12. Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g218 g
Thickness8 mm7.9 mm
Height157.5 mm163.3 mm
Width75.3 mm77.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iXiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass
ColoursTitanium Silver, Blue, BlackBlack, White, Denim Blue, Lamborgini White
Display
Screen size6.6″6.9″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,156 px1,200 px
Resolution (height)2,510 px2,608 px
Pixel density419 ppi416 ppi
Refresh rate560 Hz560 Hz
Peak brightness3,500 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness1,094 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.8%91.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 840
AnTuTu score2,480,7733,897,821
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,61011,219
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,0686,490
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.31"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2.5×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,210 mAh7,560 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)17.6 h—
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min81%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 3HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle62 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare