android.gs
Compare
Find X8s vs Poco F8 Pro

OPPO Find X8s vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro

What Find X8s does better (13) and where Poco F8 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Find X8s

9.5Score

13 advantages

Xiaomi · 2025Poco F8 Pro

9.6Score

8 advantages≈ $460

Higher score

8.0Display9.4

9.3Performance9.0

9.5Camera9.1

9.3Battery9.4

9.3Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X8sPoco F8 Pro

	Find X8s	Poco F8 Pro	Difference
Height	150.6 mm	157.5 mm	−6.9 mm
Width	71.8 mm	75.3 mm	−3.5 mm
Thickness	7.7 mm	8 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	179 g	199 g	−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X8s better than Poco F8 Pro?

AnTuTu score3,001,855 vs 2,480,773+21%
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wireless chargingYes · Poco F8 Pro: No
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Optical zoom3.5× vs 2.5×+40%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,800 vs 8,610+2%
4K selfie videoYes · Poco F8 Pro: No
Weight179 g vs 199 g+11%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 419 ppi+10%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,156 px+5%

Why is Poco F8 Pro better than Find X8s?

Refresh rate120 Hz vs 560 Hz4.7×
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 3,500 nits2.2×
Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 6,210 mAh+9%
Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · Find X8s: Yes
CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+16%
Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Find X8s9.5	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro≈ $4609.6
Design
Weight	179 g	199 g
Thickness	7.7 mm	8 mm
Height	150.6 mm	157.5 mm
Width	71.8 mm	75.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Blue, White, Pink	Titanium Silver, Blue, Black
Display
Screen size	6.3″	6.6″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,216 px	1,156 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,510 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	419 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	560 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,094 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.6%	89.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9400+	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.73 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Immortalis-G925 MC12	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	3,001,855	2,480,773
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	8,800	8,610
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,068
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	2.5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,700 mAh	6,210 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	17.6 h
Wired charging	80 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	—	81%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	62 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B