- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco F8 Pro vs Redmi K90
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K90
What Poco F8 Pro does better (2) and where Redmi K90 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.4
9.0Performance9.5
9.1Camera9.1
9.4Battery9.5
9.7Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco F8 ProRedmi K90
| Poco F8 Pro | Redmi K90 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.5 mm | 157.5 mm | = |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.3 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco F8 Pro better than Redmi K90?
- eSIMYes · Redmi K90: No
- Weight199 g vs 206 g+4%
Why is Redmi K90 better than Poco F8 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,480,773 vs 3,126,494+26%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,210 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+14%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,610 vs 9,442+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 157.5 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Blue, Black | Black, White, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,156 px | 1,156 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,510 px | 2,510 px |
| Pixel density | 419 ppi | 419 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 560 Hz | 560 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,500 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,094 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,480,773 | 3,126,494 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,610 | 9,442 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,068 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,210 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 17.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 62 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
