How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F7 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+

What Poco F7 Ultra does better (10) and where nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+ wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Ultra
9.4Score
10 advantages≈ $720
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
9.1Display9.6
9.2Performance9.8
9.2Camera8.9
8.4Battery9.8
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F7 Ultranubia RedMagic 11 Pro+
75 × 160.38.476.5 × 163.88.9
Poco F7 Ultranubia RedMagic 11 Pro+Difference
Height160.3 mm163.8 mm−3.5 mm
Width75 mm76.5 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8.9 mm−0.5 mm
Weight212 g230 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F7 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+: No
  2. Peak brightness3,200 nits vs 2,000 nits+60%
  3. Pixel density526 ppi vs 431 ppi+22%
  4. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  5. Weight212 g vs 230 g+8%
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  8. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,216 px+18%
  9. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  10. Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+6%

Why is nubia RedMagic 11 Pro+ better than Poco F7 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,580,520 vs 4,244,509+64%
  2. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 7,500 mAh+42%
  3. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,887 vs 12,013+35%
  6. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F7 Ultra: Yes
  8. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+6%
  9. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+3%
  10. Wireless charging power50 W vs 80 W+60%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight212 g230 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.9 mm
Height160.3 mm163.8 mm
Width75 mm76.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionPoco Shield GlassUnspecified
ColoursBlack, YellowBlack, Transparent Black, Transparent Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,688 px
Pixel density526 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,200 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,506 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.3%90.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 840
AnTuTu score2,580,5204,244,509
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,88712,013
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,204—
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2.5×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh7,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13.5 h—
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min88%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W80 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 3Redmagic OS 11
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle63 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare