- android.gs
- Compare
- Black Shark 4 vs TC52
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 vs Zebra TC52
What Black Shark 4 does better (20) and where TC52 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display3.6
7.3Camera3.0
8.7Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Black Shark 4TC52
| Black Shark 4 | TC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 155 mm | +8.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 18.6 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 249 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Black Shark 4 better than TC52?
- RAM12 GB vs 4 GB3×
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 32 GB8×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 600 nits2.2×
- OLED panelYes · TC52: No
- 5GYes · TC52: No
- Stereo speakersYes · TC52: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,100 mAh+10%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 5 MP4×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5″+33%
Why is TC52 better than Black Shark 4?
- Memory card slotNo · Black Shark 4: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 18.6 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 155 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Mirror Black, Pale Grey, Black, Blue, Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | — |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 694 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 512 |
| AnTuTu score | 617,456 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,448 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 120 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 176% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, gyro, light |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Joy UI 12.5 | — |
