- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo2 vs Black Shark 4
Realme GT Neo2 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4
What GT Neo2 does better (6) and where Black Shark 4 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display8.5
6.3Performance6.1
7.8Camera7.3
6.9Battery6.6
8.0Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo2Black Shark 4
| GT Neo2 | Black Shark 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 210 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo2 better than Black Shark 4?
- AnTuTu score726,039 vs 617,456+18%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Weight200 g vs 210 g+5%
- Thickness9 mm vs 9.9 mm+10%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS vs -27.4 LUFS+-8%
Why is Black Shark 4 better than GT Neo2?
- Wired charging65 W vs 120 W+85%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,185 vs 3,448+8%
- Charged in 30 min83% vs 176%2.1×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · GT Neo2: Yes
- Measured brightness659 nits vs 694 nits+5%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green | Mirror Black, Pale Grey, Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 659 nits | 694 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 726,039 | 617,456 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,185 | 3,448 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,228 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 4.0 | Joy UI 12.5 |
