- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 Pro vs Axon 20 5G Extreme
Vivo X50 Pro vs ZTE Axon 20 5G Extreme
What X50 Pro does better (9) and where Axon 20 5G Extreme wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.7
9.4Camera8.1
3.9Battery3.2
7.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50 ProAxon 20 5G Extreme
| X50 Pro | Axon 20 5G Extreme | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 172.1 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Width | 72.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 182 g | 198 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 Pro better than Axon 20 5G Extreme?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Axon 20 5G Extreme: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Axon 20 5G Extreme: No
- Battery capacity4,315 mAh vs 4,220 mAh+2%
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- Weight182 g vs 198 g+9%
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 388 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.6% vs 84.8%+7%
Why is Axon 20 5G Extreme better than X50 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X50 Pro: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Charged in 30 min57% vs 60%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 72.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Eco leather |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Sunrise Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 503 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 323,736 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,937 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,315 mAh | 4,220 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | — | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.34 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 10.5 | — |
