- android.gs
- Compare
- View30 Pro vs X50 Pro
Honor View30 Pro vs Vivo X50 Pro
What View30 Pro does better (5) and where X50 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display7.2
8.7Camera9.4
5.4Battery3.9
7.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
View30 ProX50 Pro
| View30 Pro | X50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 158.5 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.8 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 182 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is View30 Pro better than X50 Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · X50 Pro: No
- Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
- 4K selfie videoYes · X50 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+19%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 57%+23%
Why is X50 Pro better than View30 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · View30 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,100 mAh vs 4,315 mAh+5%
- Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
- Main camera40 MP vs 48 MP+20%
- Weight206 g vs 182 g+13%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 90.6%+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Yes | — |
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic frost, Sunrise Orange | Dark Blue, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 503 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 90.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 323,736 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,937 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,100 mAh | 4,315 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 57% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.34 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 3.0.1 | Funtouch 10.5 |
