- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 Pro vs Mi 11X Pro
Vivo X50 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11X Pro
What X50 Pro does better (8) and where Mi 11X Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.9
9.4Camera8.5
3.9Battery4.2
7.1Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50 ProMi 11X Pro
| X50 Pro | Mi 11X Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 72.8 mm | 76.4 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 196 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 Pro better than Mi 11X Pro?
- Optical zoom5× vs 2.1×2.4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Mi 11X Pro: No
- NFCYes · Mi 11X Pro: No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- Weight182 g vs 196 g+8%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.6% vs 85.9%+5%
Why is Mi 11X Pro better than X50 Pro?
- Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Stereo speakersNo · X50 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,315 mAh vs 4,520 mAh+5%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 72.8 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Celestial Silver, Lunar White, Cosmic Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 503 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 323,736 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,937 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2.1× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,315 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.34 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 10.5 | MIUI 12 |
