How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200T vs Poco F7 Pro

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What X200T does better (12) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
12 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $580
9.3Display9.1
9.0Performance8.6
9.3Camera9.0
9.5Battery8.1
9.7Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200TPoco F7 Pro
74.3 × 160875 × 160.38.1
X200TPoco F7 ProDifference
Height160 mm160.3 mm−0.3 mm
Width74.3 mm75 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness8 mm8.1 mm−0.1 mm
Weight203 g206 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than Poco F7 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,725,989 vs 2,065,265+32%
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,430 vs 6,661+27%
  5. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
  6. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  8. eSIMYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  9. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
  10. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
  11. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  12. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than X200T?

  1. Max video4K vs 8K
  2. Pixel density460 ppi vs 526 ppi+14%
  3. Charged in 30 min70% vs 81%+16%
  4. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight203 g206 g
Thickness8 mm8.1 mm
Height160 mm160.3 mm
Width74.3 mm75 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation CoreCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursSeaside Lilac, Stellar BlackBlack, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density460 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%89.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,725,9892,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,4306,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,921
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.8 h
Wired charging90 W90 W
Charged in 30 min70%81%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—70 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare