How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200T vs 15T Pro

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi 15T Pro

What X200T does better (5) and where 15T Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $590
vs
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Xiaomi · 202515T Pro
9.7Score
9 advantages≈ $580
Higher score
9.3Display9.7
9.0Performance9.0
9.3Camera9.8
9.5Battery9.2
9.7Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200T15T Pro
74.3 × 160877.9 × 162.78
X200T15T ProDifference
Height160 mm162.7 mm−2.7 mm
Width74.3 mm77.9 mm−3.6 mm
Thickness8 mm8 mm=
Weight203 g210 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than 15T Pro?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+13%
  2. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,430 vs 7,914+7%
  4. Weight203 g vs 210 g+3%
  5. Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%

Why is 15T Pro better than X200T?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  2. Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. Max video4K vs 8K
  5. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  6. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  7. Wireless charging power40 W vs 50 W+25%
  8. Charged in 30 min70% vs 83%+19%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Xiaomi 15T ProXiaomi 15T Pro≈ $5809.7
Design
Weight203 g210 g
Thickness8 mm8 mm
Height160 mm162.7 mm
Width74.3 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation CoreCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursSeaside Lilac, Stellar BlackBlack, Gray, Mocha Gold
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,772 px
Pixel density460 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,419 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%90.4%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score2,725,9892,683,380
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,4307,914
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,887
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.31"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—16.4 h
Wired charging90 W90 W
Charged in 30 min70%83%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power40 W50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,600
Endurance per cycle—58 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare