How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200s vs Poco F7 Pro

Vivo X200s vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What X200s does better (15) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200s
Vivo · 2025X200s
9.6Score
15 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $580
9.3Display9.1
9.2Performance8.6
9.3Camera9.0
9.5Battery8.1
9.5Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200sPoco F7 Pro
74.3 × 160875 × 160.38.1
X200sPoco F7 ProDifference
Height160 mm160.3 mm−0.3 mm
Width74.3 mm75 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness8 mm8.1 mm−0.1 mm
Weight203 g206 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200s better than Poco F7 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,830,117 vs 2,065,265+37%
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,258 vs 6,661+39%
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
  8. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  10. eSIMYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  11. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,777 vs 4,921+17%
  12. CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+13%

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than X200s?

  1. Max video4K vs 8K
  2. Pixel density460 ppi vs 526 ppi+14%
  3. Charged in 30 min70% vs 81%+16%
  4. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200sVivo X200s≈ $5509.6
Design
Weight203 g206 g
Thickness8 mm8.1 mm
Height160 mm160.3 mm
Width74.3 mm75 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursGray, Silver, Mint, PurpleBlack, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density460 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%89.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.73 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,830,1172,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,2586,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,7774,921
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.8 h
Wired charging90 W90 W
Charged in 30 min70%81%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised4—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—70 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare