android.gs
Compare
X200 Ultra vs nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

Vivo X200 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

What X200 Ultra does better (16) and where nubia Z60 Ultra Leading wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra

9.6Score

16 advantages≈ $840

Higher score

ZTE · 2024nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

9.4Score

5 advantages≈ $790

9.3Display8.7

9.3Performance8.7

9.7Camera9.5

8.4Battery8.1

9.7Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Ultranubia Z60 Ultra Leading

	X200 Ultra	nubia Z60 Ultra Leading	Difference
Height	163.1 mm	164 mm	−0.9 mm
Width	76.8 mm	76.4 mm	+0.4 mm
Thickness	8.7 mm	8.8 mm	−0.1 mm
Weight	229 g	246 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Ultra better than nubia Z60 Ultra Leading?

AnTuTu score2,914,061 vs 1,821,158+60%
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,500 nits3×
Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z60 Ultra Leading: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,410 vs 6,782+39%
Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,816 vs 5,276+29%
Pixel density510 ppi vs 400 ppi+27%
CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+27%
4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z60 Ultra Leading: No
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
Optical zoom3.7× vs 3.3×+12%

Why is nubia Z60 Ultra Leading better than X200 Ultra?

RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
Active use (test)13.6 h vs 14.1 h+4%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
Loudspeaker loudness-24.4 LUFS vs -23.9 LUFS+-2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo X200 Ultra≈ $8409.6	ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading≈ $7909.4
Design
Weight	229 g	246 g
Thickness	8.7 mm	8.8 mm
Height	163.1 mm	164 mm
Width	76.8 mm	76.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP69	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx9	IPx8
Glass protection	Armor glass	—
Colours	Black, Silver, Red	Black, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,116 px
Resolution (height)	3,168 px	2,480 px
Pixel density	510 ppi	400 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	1,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,816 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	90.2%	89.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite	Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	4.32 GHz	3.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 830	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	2,914,061	1,821,158
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,410	6,782
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	6,816	5,276
Memory
RAM	16 GB	24 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.28"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.7×	3.3×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	13.6 h	14.1 h
Wired charging	90 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	40 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.2	3.1
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.4 LUFS	-23.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OriginOS 5	MyOS 14 (International)