android.gs
Compare
Reno14 Pro vs X200 Ultra

OPPO Reno14 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra

What Reno14 Pro does better (7) and where X200 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno14 Pro

9.6Score

7 advantages≈ $800

Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra

9.6Score

15 advantages≈ $840

Higher score

8.8Display9.3

8.7Performance9.3

9.6Camera9.7

9.5Battery8.4

9.6Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 ProX200 Ultra

	Reno14 Pro	X200 Ultra	Difference
Height	163.4 mm	163.1 mm	+0.3 mm
Width	77 mm	76.8 mm	+0.2 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.7 mm	−1.2 mm
Weight	201 g	229 g	−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 Pro better than X200 Ultra?

Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
eSIMYes · X200 Ultra: No
Weight201 g vs 229 g+14%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.7 mm+16%
Charged in 30 min73% vs 64%+14%

Why is X200 Ultra better than Reno14 Pro?

Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
AnTuTu score2,048,465 vs 2,914,061+42%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,406 vs 9,410+47%
Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+33%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Pixel density450 ppi vs 510 ppi+13%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
Optical zoom3.5× vs 3.7×+6%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno14 Pro≈ $8009.6	Vivo X200 Ultra≈ $8409.6
Design
Weight	201 g	229 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.7 mm
Height	163.4 mm	163.1 mm
Width	77 mm	76.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP69
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx9
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Crystal Shield Glass	Armor glass
Colours	Titanium Gray, Brilliant White (Opal White), Purple	Black, Silver, Red
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,272 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	3,168 px
Pixel density	450 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,200 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,816 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.1%	90.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8450	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.25 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Mali-G720 MC7	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	2,048,465	2,914,061
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,406	9,410
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,816
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.28"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	3.7×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,200 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	13.6 h
Wired charging	80 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	73%	64%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	40 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite messaging	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	1.16 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	OriginOS 5