How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+

Vivo X200 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+

What X200 Ultra does better (10) and where nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6Score
10 advantages≈ $840
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ $840
9.3Display9.7
9.7Camera8.9
8.4Battery9.6
9.7Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Ultranubia RedMagic 10 Pro+
76.8 × 163.18.776.1 × 163.48.9
X200 Ultranubia RedMagic 10 Pro+Difference
Height163.1 mm163.4 mm−0.3 mm
Width76.8 mm76.1 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm−0.2 mm
Weight229 g229 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,000 nits2.2×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+: No
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+: No
  7. Pixel density510 ppi vs 431 ppi+18%
  8. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,216 px+18%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
  10. Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%

Why is nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+ better than X200 Ultra?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,050 mAh+18%
  3. Wired charging90 W vs 120 W+33%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  5. Charged in 30 min64% vs 136%2.1×
  6. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X200 Ultra: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 UltraVivo X200 Ultra≈ $8409.6
Design
Weight229 g229 g
Thickness8.7 mm8.9 mm
Height163.1 mm163.4 mm
Width76.8 mm76.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP69—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9—
Glass protectionArmor glassUnspecified
ColoursBlack, Silver, RedDark Knight, White Knight, Transparent Silver Deuterium, Transparent Dark Knight
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)3,168 px2,688 px
Pixel density510 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,816 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%91.4%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,914,061—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,410—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,816—
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.5"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.7×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh7,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)13.6 h—
Wired charging90 W120 W
Charged in 30 min64%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 5—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare