How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro vs nubia Z60S Pro

Vivo X200 Pro vs ZTE nubia Z60S Pro

What X200 Pro does better (14) and where nubia Z60S Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
14 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Z60S Pro
ZTE · 2024nubia Z60S Pro
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $720
9.1Display9.0
9.7Camera9.6
8.9Battery6.8
9.5Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pronubia Z60S Pro
76 × 162.48.276 × 163.68.7
X200 Pronubia Z60S ProDifference
Height162.4 mm163.6 mm−1.2 mm
Width76 mm76 mm=
Thickness8.2 mm8.7 mm−0.5 mm
Weight223 g220 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro better than nubia Z60S Pro?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits3.8×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z60S Pro: No
  3. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
  4. Active use (test)15.2 h vs 12.2 h+25%
  5. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z60S Pro: No
  8. eSIMYes · nubia Z60S Pro: No
  9. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+13%
  10. Optical zoom3.7× vs 3.3×+12%
  11. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%

Why is nubia Z60S Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight223 g220 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.7 mm
Height162.4 mm163.6 mm
Width76 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)Longxi glass
ColoursCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, WhiteBlack, Aqua, White
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,800 px
Pixel density452 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,200 nits
Measured brightness1,881 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.7%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,609,095—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,152—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,173—
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.7×3.3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h12.2 h
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min73%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYesYes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)MyOS 14 (International)
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare