How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro vs nubia Z60 Ultra

Vivo X200 Pro vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra

What X200 Pro does better (18) and where nubia Z60 Ultra wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
18 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
ZTE · 2023nubia Z60 Ultra
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $620
9.1Display8.7
9.2Performance8.9
9.7Camera9.5
8.9Battery8.4
9.5Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pronubia Z60 Ultra
76 × 162.48.276.4 × 1648.8
X200 Pronubia Z60 UltraDifference
Height162.4 mm164 mm−1.6 mm
Width76 mm76.4 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.8 mm−0.6 mm
Weight223 g246 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro better than nubia Z60 Ultra?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,500 nits3×
  2. AnTuTu score2,609,095 vs 2,094,586+25%
  3. Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
  4. Measured brightness1,881 nits vs 1,018 nits+85%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,152 vs 7,119+15%
  6. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  7. Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
  8. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
  9. eSIMYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
  10. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,173 vs 5,257+17%
  11. Pixel density452 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%
  12. Optical zoom3.7× vs 3.3×+12%

Why is nubia Z60 Ultra better than X200 Pro?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  3. Charged in 30 min73% vs 87%+19%
  4. Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS vs -23.6 LUFS+-6%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight223 g246 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.8 mm
Height162.4 mm164 mm
Width76 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)—
ColoursCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, WhiteBlack, Silver, Photographer Edition
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density452 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,500 nits
Measured brightness1,881 nits1,018 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,609,0952,094,586
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,1527,119
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,1735,257
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.49"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.7×3.3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h14.9 h
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min73%87%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS-23.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)MyOS 14
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare