How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

Vivo X200 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

What X200 Pro does better (21) and where nubia RedMagic 8S Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
21 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
9.1Score
3 advantages≈ $700
9.1Display8.5
9.2Performance8.2
9.7Camera7.8
8.9Battery8.9
9.5Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pronubia RedMagic 8S Pro
76 × 162.48.276.4 × 1649.5
X200 Pronubia RedMagic 8S ProDifference
Height162.4 mm164 mm−1.6 mm
Width76 mm76.4 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm9.5 mm−1.3 mm
Weight223 g228 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 8S Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,609,095 vs 1,326,652+97%
  2. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,300 nits3.5×
  3. Measured brightness1,881 nits vs 784 nits2.4×
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,152 vs 5,129+59%
  5. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  6. Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
  7. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
  8. Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
  9. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  10. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  11. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×

Why is nubia RedMagic 8S Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X200 Pro: Yes
  2. Charged in 30 min73% vs 86%+18%
  3. Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS vs -24.3 LUFS+-3%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight223 g228 g
Thickness8.2 mm9.5 mm
Height162.4 mm164 mm
Width76 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, WhiteMidnight, Platinum, Aurora
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density452 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness1,881 nits784 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,609,0951,326,652
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,1525,129
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,173—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.7×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h—
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min73%86%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 (China)
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)Redmagic OS 8
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare