How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro vs Poco F6 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

What X200 Pro does better (17) and where Poco F6 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
17 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6 Pro
8.7Score
5 advantages≈ $750
9.1Display9.2
9.2Performance8.1
9.7Camera8.9
8.9Battery5.2
9.5Features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 ProPoco F6 Pro
76 × 162.48.275 × 160.98.2
X200 ProPoco F6 ProDifference
Height162.4 mm160.9 mm+1.5 mm
Width76 mm75 mm+1 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm=
Weight223 g209 g+14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro better than Poco F6 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,609,095 vs 1,287,8542×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,152 vs 4,859+68%
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F6 Pro: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F6 Pro: No
  6. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
  7. Active use (test)15.2 h vs 10.5 h+45%
  8. Measured brightness1,881 nits vs 1,203 nits+56%
  9. Major OS updates promised4 vs 3+33%
  10. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  12. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F6 Pro: No

Why is Poco F6 Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. Wired charging90 W vs 120 W+33%
  2. Charged in 30 min73% vs 158%2.2×
  3. Pixel density452 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
  4. Weight223 g vs 209 g+7%
  5. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight223 g209 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm
Height162.4 mm160.9 mm
Width76 mm75 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, WhiteBlack, White
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density452 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,000 nits
Measured brightness1,881 nits1,203 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,609,0951,287,854
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,1524,859
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,173—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.7×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)15.2 h10.5 h
Wired charging90 W120 W
Charged in 30 min73%158%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)HyperOS
Major OS updates promised43
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare