How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro mini vs nubia Z60 Ultra

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra

What X200 Pro mini does better (15) and where nubia Z60 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro mini
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro mini
9.5Score
15 advantages≈ $660
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
ZTE · 2023nubia Z60 Ultra
9.4Score
8 advantages≈ $620
8.2Display8.7
9.2Performance8.9
9.3Camera9.5
9.1Battery8.4
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pro mininubia Z60 Ultra
71.8 × 150.88.276.4 × 1648.8
X200 Pro mininubia Z60 UltraDifference
Height150.8 mm164 mm−13.2 mm
Width71.8 mm76.4 mm−4.6 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.8 mm−0.6 mm
Weight187 g246 g−59 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro mini better than nubia Z60 Ultra?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,500 nits3×
  2. AnTuTu score2,779,129 vs 2,094,586+33%
  3. Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
  4. Measured brightness1,805 nits vs 1,018 nits+77%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,705 vs 7,119+22%
  6. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  7. Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
  8. Weight187 g vs 246 g+32%
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
  10. Pixel density460 ppi vs 400 ppi+15%
  11. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
  12. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,665 vs 5,257+8%

Why is nubia Z60 Ultra better than X200 Pro mini?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+5%
  3. Max video4K vs 8K
  4. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  5. Optical zoom3× vs 3.3×+10%
  6. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
  7. USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
  8. Charged in 30 min62% vs 87%+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight187 g246 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.8 mm
Height150.8 mm164 mm
Width71.8 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursBlack, White, Green, PinkBlack, Silver, Photographer Edition
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,480 px
Pixel density460 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,500 nits
Measured brightness1,805 nits1,018 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.5%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,779,1292,094,586
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,7057,119
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,6655,257
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.49"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3.3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,700 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—14.9 h
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min62%87%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
USB version23.1
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 5 (China)MyOS 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare