- android.gs
- Compare
- V40 Pro vs Poco F5 Pro 5G
Vivo V40 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 5G
What V40 Pro does better (11) and where Poco F5 Pro 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display8.6
8.9Camera9.1
7.8Battery8.6
9.3Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
V40 ProPoco F5 Pro 5G
| V40 Pro | Poco F5 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.8 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.6 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V40 Pro better than Poco F5 Pro 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,400 nits3.2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F5 Pro 5G: No
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+7%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F5 Pro 5G: No
- Weight192 g vs 204 g+6%
- CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.6 mm+13%
Why is Poco F5 Pro 5G better than V40 Pro?
- Wireless chargingNo · V40 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ganges Blue, Titanium Gray, Moonlight White | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,307 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | — |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.35 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,504,798 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,149 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,908 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | MIUI 14 |
