android.gs
Compare
T4 Ultra vs Poco X7 Pro

Vivo T4 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What T4 Ultra does better (10) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2025T4 Ultra

9.2Score

10 advantages≈ $420

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro

9.1Score

5 advantages≈ $370

9.3Display8.9

8.6Performance8.2

9.0Camera8.8

8.7Battery7.6

7.5Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

T4 UltraPoco X7 Pro

	T4 Ultra	Poco X7 Pro	Difference
Height	160.6 mm	160.8 mm	−0.2 mm
Width	75 mm	75.2 mm	−0.2 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.3 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	192 g	195 g	−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T4 Ultra better than Poco X7 Pro?

AnTuTu score2,286,808 vs 1,568,331+46%
Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,749 vs 6,311+7%
CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+5%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 446 ppi+3%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than T4 Ultra?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
Charged in 30 min62% vs 71%+15%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo T4 Ultra≈ $4209.2	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro≈ $3709.1
Design
Weight	192 g	195 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	8.3 mm
Height	160.6 mm	160.8 mm
Width	75 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP64	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Phoenix Gold, Meteor Grey	Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,260 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.2%	88.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9300+	Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.4 GHz	3.25 GHz
GPU	Immortalis-G720 MC12	Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score	2,286,808	1,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,749	6,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,880
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,500 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	71%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.99 W/kg	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 15	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	—	C
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	50 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	C