- android.gs
- Compare
- T4 Ultra vs Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
Vivo T4 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
What T4 Ultra does better (11) and where Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.4
9.0Camera8.2
8.7Battery8.8
7.5Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
T4 UltraRedmi Note 15 Pro (China)
| T4 Ultra | Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.6 mm | 163.6 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 78.1 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 211 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T4 Ultra better than Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)?
- Wired charging90 W vs 45 W2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 15 Pro (China): No
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+56%
- CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+31%
- Weight192 g vs 211 g+10%
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 443 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 86.8%+3%
Why is Redmi Note 15 Pro (China) better than T4 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 160.6 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Colours | Phoenix Gold, Meteor Grey | Black, Purple, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 443 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 86.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,286,808 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,749 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 2 |
