How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. S50 vs Poco X7 Pro

Vivo S50 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What S50 does better (11) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo S50
Vivo · 2025S50
9.4Score
11 advantages≈ $390
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $370
8.3Display8.9
8.5Performance8.2
9.4Camera8.8
9.2Battery7.6
8.9Features8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

S50Poco X7 Pro
74.3 × 157.57.675.2 × 160.88.3
S50Poco X7 ProDifference
Height157.5 mm160.8 mm−3.3 mm
Width74.3 mm75.2 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness7.6 mm8.3 mm−0.7 mm
Weight196 g195 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is S50 better than Poco X7 Pro?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
  2. AnTuTu score1,794,400 vs 1,568,331+14%
  3. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  4. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+8%
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
  7. Pixel density459 ppi vs 446 ppi+3%
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  9. Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm+9%
  10. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 88.8%+2%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than S50?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,710 vs 6,311+11%
  2. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+8%
  3. Charged in 30 min48% vs 71%+48%
  4. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo S50Vivo S50≈ $3909.4
Design
Weight196 g195 g
Thickness7.6 mm8.3 mm
Height157.5 mm160.8 mm
Width74.3 mm75.2 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, Blue, White, PurpleBlack/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,750 px2,712 px
Pixel density459 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%88.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.25 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score1,794,4001,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,7106,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,880
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—12.7 h
Wired charging90 W90 W
Charged in 30 min48%71%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—C
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—50 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare