- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 FE vs Poco X7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
What Galaxy S25 FE does better (17) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display8.9
7.9Performance8.2
9.3Camera8.8
4.8Battery7.6
9.8Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 FEPoco X7 Pro
| Galaxy S25 FE | Poco X7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 160.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.2 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 195 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Poco X7 Pro?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,948 vs 6,311+10%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
- Energy classB vs C
- Battery charge cycles2,000 vs 1,0002×
- Drop resistance classA vs C
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,262 vs 3,880+10%
- Weight190 g vs 195 g+3%
Why is Poco X7 Pro better than Galaxy S25 FE?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+22%
- Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 3,200 nits+68%
- AnTuTu score1,521,140 vs 1,568,331+3%
- Active use (test)11.9 h vs 12.7 h+7%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 446 ppi+16%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Endurance per cycle43 h vs 50 h+16%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 160.8 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White | Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,247 nits | 1,265 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,521,140 | 1,568,331 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,948 | 6,311 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,262 | 3,880 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | 12.7 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.6 LUFS | -24.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.54 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | C |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 43 h | 50 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S258.98.9vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsInfinix Note 50 Pro+8.98.9vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S24 FE8.98.8vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Pova 7 Ultra8.99.0vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.98.8vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S23 FE8.98.3