How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9 Pro vs nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (9) and where nubia Z60 Ultra Leading wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
9 advantages
vs
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading
9.4Score
12 advantages≈ $790
Higher score
9.4Display8.7
8.6Performance8.7
8.9Camera9.5
8.6Battery8.1
7.7Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9 Pronubia Z60 Ultra Leading
75.7 × 163.5876.4 × 1648.8
iQOO Neo9 Pronubia Z60 Ultra LeadingDifference
Height163.5 mm164 mm−0.5 mm
Width75.7 mm76.4 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness8 mm8.8 mm−0.8 mm
Weight190 g246 g−56 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than nubia Z60 Ultra Leading?

  1. AnTuTu score2,386,903 vs 1,821,158+31%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
  3. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,500 nits2×
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  5. Weight190 g vs 246 g+29%
  6. Pixel density453 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%
  7. Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%
  8. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,116 px+13%
  9. Thickness8 mm vs 8.8 mm+10%

Why is nubia Z60 Ultra Leading better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
  5. Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,445 vs 6,782+25%
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  9. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+6%
  10. USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
  11. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight190 g246 g
Thickness8 mm8.8 mm
Height163.5 mm164 mm
Width75.7 mm76.4 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP54IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation Up—
ColoursFiery Red, Conqueror BlackBlack, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density453 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,386,9031,821,158
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,4456,782
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,276
Memory
RAM12 GB24 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.49"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,160 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—14.1 h
Wired charging120 W80 W
Charged in 30 min136%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
USB version23.1
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 14MyOS 14 (International)
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare