How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 9S Pro

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 9S Pro

What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (9) and where nubia RedMagic 9S Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
9 advantages
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 9S Pro
9.4Score
8 advantages≈ $770
Higher score
9.4Display8.7
8.6Performance8.6
8.9Camera8.9
8.6Battery9.2
7.7Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9 Pronubia RedMagic 9S Pro
75.7 × 163.5876.4 × 1648.9
iQOO Neo9 Pronubia RedMagic 9S ProDifference
Height163.5 mm164 mm−0.5 mm
Width75.7 mm76.4 mm−0.7 mm
Thickness8 mm8.9 mm−0.9 mm
Weight190 g229 g−39 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 9S Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,386,903 vs 1,631,366+46%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
  3. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+88%
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  5. Weight190 g vs 229 g+21%
  6. Pixel density453 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%
  7. Charged in 30 min136% vs 86%+58%
  8. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,116 px+13%
  9. Thickness8 mm vs 8.9 mm+11%

Why is nubia RedMagic 9S Pro better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+26%
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,445 vs 6,403+18%
  5. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
  7. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+6%
  8. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight190 g229 g
Thickness8 mm8.9 mm
Height163.5 mm164 mm
Width75.7 mm76.4 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Glass protectionSchott Xensation UpCorning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursFiery Red, Conqueror BlackDesign Sleet (Black Version), Snowfall (Silver Version), Cyclone (Transparent Black Version), Frost (White Version)
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density453 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,058 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,386,9031,631,366
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,4456,403
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,429
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.49"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,160 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—17.1 h
Wired charging120 W80 W
Charged in 30 min136%86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 14Redmagic OS 9.5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare