- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+
What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (5) and where nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.7
8.9Camera8.9
8.6Battery9.6
7.7Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 Pronubia RedMagic 10 Pro+
| iQOO Neo9 Pro | nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 229 g | −39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+?
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 2,000 nits+50%
- Weight190 g vs 229 g+21%
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 431 ppi+5%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.9 mm+11%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,216 px+4%
Why is nubia RedMagic 10 Pro+ better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 7,050 mAh+37%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+35%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 229 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | Unspecified |
| Colours | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Dark Knight, White Knight, Transparent Silver Deuterium, Transparent Dark Knight |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,688 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 91.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,386,903 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,445 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 7,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | — |
