- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Axon 60 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (4) and where Axon 60 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
9.4Display9.5
8.9Camera8.8
8.6Battery8.9
7.7Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 ProAxon 60 Ultra
| iQOO Neo9 Pro | Axon 60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Axon 60 Ultra?
- Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.1 mm+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Why is Axon 60 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | — |
| Colours | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Obsidian Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,386,903 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,445 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | — |
