- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Redmi K70 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (4) and where Redmi K70 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.5
8.6Performance9.1
8.9Camera9.0
8.6Battery9.0
7.7Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 ProRedmi K70 Ultra
| iQOO Neo9 Pro | Redmi K70 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.4 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 211 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Redmi K70 Ultra?
- Weight190 g vs 211 g+11%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 125%+9%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
Why is Redmi K70 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,445 vs 7,541+38%
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+7%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,000 nits+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, White, Violet, Green Championship Edition, Orange Championship Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,386,903 | 2,384,849 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,445 | 7,541 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,834 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 125% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | HyperOS |
