- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro vs T3 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (7) and where T3 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.4
8.6Performance8.4
8.9Camera9.1
8.6Battery8.5
7.7Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 ProT3 Ultra
| iQOO Neo9 Pro | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.9 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 192 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than T3 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score2,386,903 vs 1,870,185+28%
- Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 54%2.5×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
Why is T3 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+7%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.6 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,386,903 | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,445 | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | Funtouch 14 |
