- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro vs iQOO Z9 Turbo
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
What iQOO Neo9 Pro does better (8) and where iQOO Z9 Turbo wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.7
8.6Performance8.5
8.9Camera8.6
8.6Battery8.9
7.7Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 ProiQOO Z9 Turbo
| iQOO Neo9 Pro | iQOO Z9 Turbo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 190 g | 195 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than iQOO Z9 Turbo?
- AnTuTu score2,386,903 vs 1,805,187+32%
- Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,445 vs 5,179+5%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Weight190 g vs 195 g+3%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 88%+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is iQOO Z9 Turbo better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | — |
| Colours | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,386,903 | 1,805,187 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,445 | 5,179 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,116 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | OriginOS 4 |
