- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo7 Racing vs Poco F5 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
What iQOO Neo7 Racing does better (6) and where Poco F5 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.6
8.1Camera9.2
7.8Battery8.6
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo7 RacingPoco F5 Pro
| iQOO Neo7 Racing | Poco F5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 162.8 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 204 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo7 Racing better than Poco F5 Pro?
- Wired charging120 W vs 67 W+79%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Charged in 30 min188% vs 100%+88%
- Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 1,400 nits+7%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- Weight197 g vs 204 g+4%
Why is Poco F5 Pro better than iQOO Neo7 Racing?
- Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo7 Racing: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · iQOO Neo7 Racing: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 526 ppi+36%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Orange, Black, Blue | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,059 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,057,977 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,001 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 188% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 3 | HyperOS 3 |
