android.gs
Compare
iQOO Neo7 Racing vs 13 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra

What iQOO Neo7 Racing does better (4) and where 13 Ultra wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2023iQOO Neo7 Racing

8.6Score

4 advantages≈ $410

Xiaomi · 202313 Ultra

9.2Score

14 advantages≈ $420

Higher score

8.2Display8.8

8.1Camera9.7

7.8Battery6.3

7.9Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo7 Racing13 Ultra

	iQOO Neo7 Racing	13 Ultra	Difference
Height	164.8 mm	163.2 mm	+1.6 mm
Width	76.9 mm	74.6 mm	+2.3 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	9.1 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	197 g	227 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo7 Racing better than 13 Ultra?

Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
Charged in 30 min188% vs 86%2.2×
Weight197 g vs 227 g+15%
Thickness8.5 mm vs 9.1 mm+7%

Why is 13 Ultra better than iQOO Neo7 Racing?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo7 Racing: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo7 Racing: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · iQOO Neo7 Racing: Yes
Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
Pixel density388 ppi vs 522 ppi+35%
Rear cameras2 vs 42×
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing≈ $4108.6	Xiaomi 13 Ultra≈ $4209.2
Design
Weight	197 g	227 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	9.1 mm
Height	164.8 mm	163.2 mm
Width	76.9 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Eco leather
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Orange, Black, Blue	Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	388 ppi	522 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,500 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,207 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.6%	89.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	—	1,268,538
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	5,049
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,488
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1"
Rear cameras	2	4
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	10.2 h
Wired charging	120 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	188%	86%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OriginOS 3	HyperOS