- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo 7 vs Redmi K60 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
What iQOO Neo 7 does better (3) and where Redmi K60 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display8.6
7.6Performance8.4
7.9Camera9.1
7.8Battery8.2
8.1Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo 7Redmi K60 Pro
| iQOO Neo 7 | Redmi K60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 162.8 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 193 g | 201 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo 7 better than Redmi K60 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 54 MP+19%
- Weight193 g vs 201 g+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi K60 Pro better than iQOO Neo 7?
- AnTuTu score1,241,266 vs 1,710,757+38%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,292 vs 4,979+51%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,790 vs 3,6242×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo 7: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 526 ppi+36%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · iQOO Neo 7: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,400 nits+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,241,266 | 1,710,757 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,292 | 4,979 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,790 | 3,624 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 54 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 150% | 158% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MIUI 14 |
