How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO 9 Pro vs Poco F4 GT

Vivo iQOO 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

What iQOO 9 Pro does better (16) and where Poco F4 GT wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Vivo · 2022iQOO 9 Pro
8.9Score
16 advantages≈ $680
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Xiaomi · 2022Poco F4 GT
8.5Score
5 advantages≈ $620
8.7Display7.4
7.2Performance7.3
9.1Camera8.0
7.9Battery6.8
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 9 ProPoco F4 GT
75.2 × 164.88.876.7 × 162.58.5
iQOO 9 ProPoco F4 GTDifference
Height164.8 mm162.5 mm+2.3 mm
Width75.2 mm76.7 mm−1.5 mm
Thickness8.8 mm8.5 mm+0.3 mm
Weight204 g210 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 9 Pro better than Poco F4 GT?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Optical stabilisationYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  5. Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 800 nits+88%
  6. Measured brightness1,000 nits vs 758 nits+32%
  7. Pixel density518 ppi vs 395 ppi+31%
  8. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  9. Max video8K vs 4K
  10. Weight204 g vs 210 g+3%
  11. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  12. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%

Why is Poco F4 GT better than iQOO 9 Pro?

  1. Stereo speakersNo · iQOO 9 Pro: Yes
  2. AnTuTu score862,324 vs 952,124+10%
  3. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  4. Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
  5. Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO 9 ProVivo iQOO 9 Pro≈ $6808.9
Design
Weight204 g210 g
Thickness8.8 mm8.5 mm
Height164.8 mm162.5 mm
Width75.2 mm76.7 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Glass protectionPanda GlassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursLegend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, OrangeStealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO2 AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,400 px
Pixel density518 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,500 nits800 nits
Measured brightness1,000 nits758 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%86.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 730
AnTuTu score862,324952,124
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,7083,637
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,471
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.57"1/1.73"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2.5×—
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min188%176%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.8 LUFS-27.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicSide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.59 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 12 (International)HyperOS 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare