android.gs
Compare
iQOO 12 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 7

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 7

What iQOO 12 Pro does better (20) and where nubia RedMagic 7 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2023iQOO 12 Pro

9.4Score

20 advantages≈ $700

Higher score

ZTE · 2022nubia RedMagic 7

8.7Score

5 advantages≈ $680

9.5Display8.1

9.0Performance7.8

9.2Camera7.7

9.2Battery6.6

7.8Features9.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 12 Pronubia RedMagic 7

	iQOO 12 Pro	nubia RedMagic 7	Difference
Height	164.6 mm	170.6 mm	−6 mm
Width	75.4 mm	78.3 mm	−2.9 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	9.5 mm	−0.9 mm
Weight	205 g	215 g	−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 12 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 7?

AnTuTu score2,433,337 vs 1,056,4882.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,034 vs 3,855+82%
Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 700 nits4.3×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 7: No
Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 7: No
Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 7: No
Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+13%
Pixel density518 ppi vs 387 ppi+34%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%

Why is nubia RedMagic 7 better than iQOO 12 Pro?

Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
RAM16 GB vs 18 GB+12%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO 12 Pro: Yes
USB version2 vs 3+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO 12 Pro≈ $7009.4	ZTE nubia RedMagic 7≈ $6808.7
Design
Weight	205 g	215 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	9.5 mm
Height	164.6 mm	170.6 mm
Width	75.4 mm	78.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black, Red, White (BMW M branding)	Obsidian, Pulsar, Supernova
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,200 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	518 ppi	387 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	700 nits
Measured brightness	—	527 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.4%	83.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	2,433,337	1,056,488
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	7,034	3,855
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,525	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	18 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1/1.97"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	4,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	176%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.0
USB version	2	3
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-22.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 14 (International)	Redmagic 5.0
Major OS updates promised	2	—