android.gs
Compare
iQOO 12 Pro vs 14

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs Xiaomi 14

What iQOO 12 Pro does better (8) and where 14 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2023iQOO 12 Pro

9.4Score

8 advantages≈ $700

Higher score

Xiaomi · 202314

9.2Score

9 advantages≈ $750

9.5Display8.0

9.0Performance8.7

9.2Camera9.5

9.2Battery7.3

7.8Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 12 Pro14

	iQOO 12 Pro	14	Difference
Height	164.6 mm	152.8 mm	+11.8 mm
Width	75.4 mm	71.5 mm	+3.9 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.2 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	205 g	188 g	+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 12 Pro better than 14?

AnTuTu score2,433,337 vs 2,003,429+21%
Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,610 mAh+11%
Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,034 vs 6,810+3%
Pixel density518 ppi vs 460 ppi+13%
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+7%
Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,200 px+20%

Why is 14 better than iQOO 12 Pro?

Major OS updates promised2 vs 42×
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
4K selfie videoNo · iQOO 12 Pro: Yes
eSIMNo · iQOO 12 Pro: Yes
Weight205 g vs 188 g+9%
Optical zoom3× vs 3.2×+7%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO 12 Pro≈ $7009.4	Xiaomi 14≈ $7509.2
Design
Weight	205 g	188 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.2 mm
Height	164.6 mm	152.8 mm
Width	75.4 mm	71.5 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Black, Red, White (BMW M branding)	Black, White, Jade Green, Pink
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.4″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	LTPO OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,200 px
Resolution (height)	3,200 px	2,670 px
Pixel density	518 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,175 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.4%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	2,433,337	2,003,429
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	7,034	6,810
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,525	4,567
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3.2×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	4,610 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.9 h
Wired charging	120 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	97%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 14 (International)	HyperOS 1.1
Major OS updates promised	2	4