- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO 11 Pro vs iQOO 12 Pro
Vivo iQOO 11 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
What iQOO 11 Pro does better (1) and where iQOO 12 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.5
9.0Camera9.2
8.0Battery9.2
8.7Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO 11 ProiQOO 12 Pro
| iQOO 11 Pro | iQOO 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.6 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 205 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO 11 Pro better than iQOO 12 Pro?
- Wired charging200 W vs 120 W+67%
Why is iQOO 12 Pro better than iQOO 11 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+9%
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
- Optical zoom2.1× vs 3×+43%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
- Weight210 g vs 205 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO4 AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 518 ppi | 518 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,433,337 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,034 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,525 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.1× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 200 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 300% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 (International) | Funtouch 14 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
