android.gs
Compare
iQOO 11 Pro vs nubia Z50S Pro

Vivo iQOO 11 Pro vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro

What iQOO 11 Pro does better (7) and where nubia Z50S Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2022iQOO 11 Pro

9.1Score

7 advantages≈ $860

ZTE · 2023nubia Z50S Pro

9.2Score

9 advantages≈ $860

Higher score

9.3Display9.1

9.0Camera9.6

8.0Battery6.8

8.7Features9.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO 11 Pronubia Z50S Pro

	iQOO 11 Pro	nubia Z50S Pro	Difference
Height	164.8 mm	163.9 mm	+0.9 mm
Width	75.3 mm	76.3 mm	−1 mm
Thickness	8.9 mm	8.3 mm	+0.6 mm
Weight	210 g	228 g	−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO 11 Pro better than nubia Z50S Pro?

Wired charging200 W vs 80 W2.5×
Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,200 nits+50%
Pixel density518 ppi vs 452 ppi+15%
Weight210 g vs 228 g+8%
Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%

Why is nubia Z50S Pro better than iQOO 11 Pro?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+9%
Optical zoom2.1× vs 3.3×+57%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+5%
USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO 11 Pro≈ $8609.1	ZTE nubia Z50S Pro≈ $8609.2
Design
Weight	210 g	228 g
Thickness	8.9 mm	8.3 mm
Height	164.8 mm	163.9 mm
Width	75.3 mm	76.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Colours	Black, Green, White (BMW M branding)	Black, Khaki, Silver/White
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO4 AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	3,200 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	518 ppi	452 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,800 nits	1,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,029 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.4%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	3.36 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	—	1,650,939
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	5,569
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.49"	1/1.49"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2.1×	3.3×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	5,100 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.5 h
Wired charging	200 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	300%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	2	3.1
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 13 (International)	MyOS 13