- android.gs
- Compare
- RugOne Xever 7 Pro vs Poco F7
UleFone RugOne Xever 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7
What RugOne Xever 7 Pro does better (4) and where Poco F7 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display9.4
6.3Camera8.8
8.2Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
RugOne Xever 7 ProPoco F7
| RugOne Xever 7 Pro | Poco F7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.6 mm | 163.1 mm | +10.5 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 77.9 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 8.2 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 325 g | 216 g | +109 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RugOne Xever 7 Pro better than Poco F7?
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Energy classA vs B
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Poco F7 better than RugOne Xever 7 Pro?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 3,200 nits6.4×
- Optical stabilisationNo · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,550 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+17%
- Weight325 g vs 216 g+51%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
- Thickness14.1 mm vs 8.2 mm+72%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,280 px+19%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 325 g | 216 g |
| Thickness | 14.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 173.6 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 84.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | — | Black, White, Cyber Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,525 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,024,751 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,402 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,476 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,550 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | — | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 80% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 64 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
