- android.gs
- Compare
- Power Armor 19T vs iQOO Neo 7
UleFone Power Armor 19T vs Vivo iQOO Neo 7
What Power Armor 19T does better (8) and where iQOO Neo 7 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display8.1
6.2Camera7.9
9.2Battery7.8
6.0Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Power Armor 19TiQOO Neo 7
| Power Armor 19T | iQOO Neo 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 175.2 mm | 164.8 mm | +10.4 mm |
| Width | 83.4 mm | 76.9 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 18.8 mm | 8.6 mm | +10.2 mm |
| Weight | 409 g | 193 g | +216 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Power Armor 19T better than iQOO Neo 7?
- Battery capacity9,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+92%
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 388 ppi+3%
Why is iQOO Neo 7 better than Power Armor 19T?
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- Weight409 g vs 193 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · Power Armor 19T: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Power Armor 19T: Yes
- 5GNo · Power Armor 19T: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Power Armor 19T: Yes
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 150%2.9×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Thickness18.8 mm vs 8.6 mm2.2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 409 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 18.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 175.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 83.4 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.4% | 87.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,241,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,292 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,790 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 150% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
