How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Power Armor 18T vs Poco F4 GT

UleFone Power Armor 18T vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

What Power Armor 18T does better (7) and where Poco F4 GT wins (12) — every spec side by side.

UleFone Power Armor 18T
UleFone · 2022Power Armor 18T
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $690
vs
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Xiaomi · 2022Poco F4 GT
8.5Score
12 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
6.7Display7.4
7.0Camera8.0
9.2Battery6.8
8.2Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Power Armor 18TPoco F4 GT
83.4 × 175.218.876.7 × 162.58.5
Power Armor 18TPoco F4 GTDifference
Height175.2 mm162.5 mm+12.7 mm
Width83.4 mm76.7 mm+6.7 mm
Thickness18.8 mm8.5 mm+10.3 mm
Weight409 g210 g+199 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Power Armor 18T better than Poco F4 GT?

  1. Battery capacity9,600 mAh vs 4,700 mAh2×
  2. Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  4. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  5. Memory card slotYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  6. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  7. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%

Why is Poco F4 GT better than Power Armor 18T?

  1. Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
  2. OLED panelNo · Power Armor 18T: Yes
  3. Stereo speakersNo · Power Armor 18T: Yes
  4. Weight409 g vs 210 g+95%
  5. Charged in 30 min52% vs 176%3.4×
  6. Thickness18.8 mm vs 8.5 mm2.2×
  7. CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
  8. Ultra-wide cameraNo · Power Armor 18T: Yes
  9. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  10. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
  11. Screen-to-body ratio71.4% vs 86.2%+21%
  12. Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight409 g210 g
Thickness18.8 mm8.5 mm
Height175.2 mm162.5 mm
Width83.4 mm76.7 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlackStealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDAMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,408 px2,400 px
Pixel density401 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—800 nits
Measured brightness—758 nits
Screen-to-body ratio71.4%86.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 900Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.4 GHz3 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 730
AnTuTu score—952,124
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,637
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,471
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera108 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.52"1/1.73"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity9,600 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging66 W120 W
Charged in 30 min52%176%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth55.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.59 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare