How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs Poco F7 Ultra

UleFone Armor 29 Pro Thermal vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

What Armor 29 Pro Thermal does better (5) and where Poco F7 Ultra wins (18) — every spec side by side.

UleFone Armor 29 Pro Thermal
UleFone · 2025Armor 29 Pro Thermal
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $640
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Ultra
9.4Score
18 advantages≈ $720
Higher score
8.6Display9.1
7.3Camera9.2
9.7Battery8.4
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor 29 Pro ThermalPoco F7 Ultra
85.6 × 177.433.875 × 160.38.4
Armor 29 Pro ThermalPoco F7 UltraDifference
Height177.4 mm160.3 mm+17.1 mm
Width85.6 mm75 mm+10.6 mm
Thickness33.8 mm8.4 mm+25.4 mm
Weight688 g212 g+476 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor 29 Pro Thermal better than Poco F7 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity21,200 mAh vs 5,300 mAh4×
  2. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is Poco F7 Ultra better than Armor 29 Pro Thermal?

  1. Weight688 g vs 212 g3.2×
  2. Optical stabilisationNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  5. Stereo speakersNo · Armor 29 Pro Thermal: Yes
  6. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+66%
  7. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 3,200 nits+45%
  8. Thickness33.8 mm vs 8.4 mm4×
  9. Pixel density395 ppi vs 526 ppi+33%
  10. Max video4K vs 8K
  11. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. Charged in 30 min60% vs 88%+47%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight688 g212 g
Thickness33.8 mm8.4 mm
Height177.4 mm160.3 mm
Width85.6 mm75 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Poco Shield Glass
ColoursBlackBlack, Yellow
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px3,200 px
Pixel density395 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,506 nits
Screen-to-body ratio70.7%89.3%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 830
AnTuTu score—2,580,520
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,887
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,204
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.55"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2.5×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity21,200 mAh5,300 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)—13.5 h
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min60%88%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—63 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare