- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 25T vs T3 Ultra
UleFone Armor 25T vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Armor 25T does better (6) and where T3 Ultra wins (17) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 25TT3 Ultra
| Armor 25T | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 177.4 mm | 164.2 mm | +13.2 mm |
| Width | 81.4 mm | 74.9 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.5 mm | 7.6 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Weight | 326 g | 192 g | +134 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 25T better than T3 Ultra?
- Wireless chargingYes · T3 Ultra: No
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · T3 Ultra: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T3 Ultra: No
Why is T3 Ultra better than Armor 25T?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Armor 25T: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Armor 25T: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Armor 25T: Yes
- Weight326 g vs 192 g+70%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Armor 25T: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Armor 25T: Yes
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 453 ppi+14%
- Thickness12.5 mm vs 7.6 mm+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 326 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 12.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 177.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 81.4 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Black | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.6% | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
