- android.gs
- Compare
- Armor 11T 5G vs X60 Pro
UleFone Armor 11T 5G vs Vivo X60 Pro
What Armor 11T 5G does better (3) and where X60 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Display7.7
5.7Camera8.6
6.6Battery3.8
7.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Armor 11T 5GX60 Pro
| Armor 11T 5G | X60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 158.6 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 73.2 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.2 mm | 7.6 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Weight | 293 g | 179 g | +114 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Armor 11T 5G better than X60 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+24%
- Wireless chargingYes · X60 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X60 Pro: No
Why is X60 Pro better than Armor 11T 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Armor 11T 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Armor 11T 5G: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Armor 11T 5G: Yes
- Weight293 g vs 179 g+64%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+60%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 398 ppi+41%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Armor 11T 5G: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 293 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 14.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Oleophobic coating | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Black | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,560 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 68.3% | 90.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP4 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 639,612 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,490 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 10 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.53 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 11.1 |
