- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova Slim vs Y400 4G
Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo Y400 4G
What Pova Slim does better (10) and where Y400 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova SlimY400 4G
| Pova Slim | Y400 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 162.3 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 196 g | −40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova Slim better than Y400 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Weight156 g vs 196 g+26%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Thickness6 mm vs 7.9 mm+32%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Y400 4G better than Pova Slim?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Stereo speakersNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
- Dual SIMNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,578 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 613,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,988 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
