- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 vs Pova Slim
Tecno Camon 40 vs Tecno Pova Slim
What Camon 40 does better (9) and where Pova Slim wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40Pova Slim
| Camon 40 | Pova Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 156 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 better than Pova Slim?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Slim: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Pova Slim: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Slim: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Pova Slim: No
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 53%+23%
Why is Pova Slim better than Camon 40?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
- 5GNo · Camon 40: Yes
- AnTuTu score575,113 vs 613,165+7%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Weight177 g vs 156 g+14%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 440 ppi+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 6 mm+22%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda King Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,578 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 575,113 | 613,165 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,986 | 1,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
