- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova Slim vs T4R
Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo T4R
What Pova Slim does better (9) and where T4R wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova SlimT4R
| Pova Slim | T4R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 184 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova Slim better than T4R?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- NFCYes · T4R: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Weight156 g vs 184 g+18%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 388 ppi+13%
- Thickness6 mm vs 7.4 mm+23%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is T4R better than Pova Slim?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+10%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Diamond Shield Glass |
| Colours | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black | Arctic White, Twilight Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,578 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 88.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 613,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,988 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
